Replublican Senators John McCain of Arizona and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma announced today that they plan to make the practice of earmarking more difficult, and more public. Earmarks, pet budget items designed to ingratiate voters to their representatives, were estimated by Citizens Against Government Waste to cost $27.3 billion last year.
McCain also plans to introduct a reform bill that would require disclosure of any gifts worth more than $20 and any travel provided to members of congress. Members would also be required to pay fair market value for flights on private planes.
Now here comes the rant part of this post. Can someone explain to me why the federal government ever gives money to states or local governments? The federal government is supposed to protect us, protect trade, etc. If they have the money to give send back down the chain, they probably are taking too much of our money.
Here’s my theory of taxation: Collect money at the state level and let them buy services from the federal government. The federal government should have a national sales tax set at a level that allows the running of the military, border control, federal court system, etc. Social Security could still exist, but states would have the option of buying into the system (passing up taxes that they collected), running their own system, or hiring a private company to run the program. The federal government can run just as many programs as it does today if it can convince states that it can do it better.
All of this is, of course, is a by-product of the Abramoff scandal. This scandal along with the rumored Barrett Report illustrate how we have given too much power to the federal government and the “statesmen” running it. If you’re not familiar with the Barret Report see this column from Robert Novak. No matter what your political viewpoint, the idea that YOUR government can investigate itself and then hide the result from you should send a shudder down your spine.
via CNN and The Washington Post